SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Bom) 116

D.N.MEHTA
Neeta Deelipkumar Suchak – Appellant
Versus
Deelipkumar Mohanlal Suchak & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.N. MEHTA, J.:---The petitioner herein Neeta Deelipkumar Suchak, has filed this petition in forma pauperis against her husband-respondent No. 1, her husband's three brothers-respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 5 as also against her father-in-law respondent No. 4, and two Companies-respondent Nos. 6 and 7 being presumable the Partnership Firms of respondents Nos. 1 to 5. The petitioner has prayed firstly that she may be permitted to sue in forma pauperis; Secondly, that, the respondents Nos. 1 to 5 be ordered and decreed to pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs. 5,000/- per month from the date of the petition ; thirdly, the petitioner prays for a decree against the respondents for the sum of Rs. 27,528/- together with interest thereon at the rate of 18 per cent per annum from 21-10-1979 till payment ; fourthly, the petitioner has prayed that respondent Nos. 1 to 5 be ordered to return to the petitioner articles and things mentioned in Exhibit 'D' to the petition, or in the alternative, in the event of respondents Nos. 1 to 5 failing to return her articles and things a decree for the sum of Rs. 45,000/- be passed against them together with interest thereon at the rate of 18 per cent pe


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top