B.A.MASODKAR
Vimalabai w/o Jayant Pawar – Appellant
Versus
Laxmibai w/o Jaywantrao Nandrekar – Respondent
2. In this Court, Mr. Apte, the learned Counsel appearing in support of the petition, argued that in the context of the facts available in the present litigation, section 13(1)(b) of the Act should not have been applied. He submitted that the roof of the tenanted premises was covered with Shahabadi stone and the respondent-landlady was trying to remove it and, therefore, to protect the tenement, the petitioner, tenant had to resort to this construction. As against this, the appeal Court has found that the tenement collapsed in the rainy season and, therefore, except the petitioner-tenant, everyone left the premises and the petitioner-tenant constructed the roof itself and covered it by Mangalor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.