SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Bom) 195

D.B.DESHPANDE
Venkat s/o Niloba Kabade – Appellant
Versus
Kishan s/o Dadarao Dhumal – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.B. DESHPANDE, J.:---In a suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-petitioner for declaration of his ownership and for perpetual injunction in respect of the suit-property including one godown which is in a portion of the suit-property the trial Court passed the following order below Exh. 51 in Regular Civil Suit No. 328/81 on its file and the order is as follows :---

"The application of plaintiff Exh. 51 is allowed. By issuing mandatory injunction the plaintiff be restored with possession of disputed godown on the ground floor of the suit-house....."

I have reproduced the portion relevant for our purpose. This order was passed on 8th October, 1982. Thereafter, the plaintiff gave another application (Exh. 67) in the trial Court on 14th February, 1983. By this application the plaintiff prayed that process be kindly issued to execute the mandatory injunction through the bailiff of the Honourable Court directing the bailiff to deliver vacant possession of the godown to the plaintiff by removing all the belongings of the defendant from that godown. Below this application the trial Court passed the following order :---

"Heard Advocate for the plaintiff.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top