SHARAD MANOHAR
Sitaram Laxminarayan Rathi – Appellant
Versus
Sitaram Kashiram Koli & others – Respondent
2. The relevant facts are as follows :---
On 19-5-1973, a sum of Rs. 1,500/- was purported to be advanced by the petitioner (hereinafter "the plaintiff") to respondent No. 1 acting on behalf of the respondents (hereinafter "the defendants"). Admittedly the amount was paid against three post dated cheques of Rs. 5000/- each but the total amount actually paid was not Rs. 1,500/- but Rs. 1,410/- only. A sum of Rs. 90/- was purported to be deducted as commission payable by the defendants to the plaintiffs. However, it is fairly conceded by Mr. Soni, the learned Advocate appearing before me for the petitioner that this was in fact a deduction of interest in advance. But his explanation is meaningless because if the interest was deducted even before the advance was made it only means that the sum advanced was the lesser amount. Mr. Soni conceded this position and the entire petition was argued on the basis that what was advanced by the plaintiff to the defendants against the three post-dat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.