SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Bom) 171

M.R.WAIKAR, G.F.COUTO
Shaba Yeshwant Naik – Appellant
Versus
Vinodkumar Gosalia and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Waikar, J.-This appeal is filed by the original judgment-debtor and it raises a question about the interpretation and import of section 39 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereafter called 'the Code'). The question arises under the following set of facts:-

2. Shri Shaba Naik (Appellant) obtained a money decree in Civil Suit No. 26 of 1969 against Shri Govind Naik (Respondent No. 3) in the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Margao. On the application of the decree-holder for execution, certain immovable properties situate at Quepem outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Margao Court were attached on 17-7-1969. The Margao Court by its order dated 8-7-1969 had also issued an order prohibiting the judgment-debtor from selling the pro- perty to any one. On 3-9-1969, that is, after the attachment of the pro- perty, it Appeared that the present respondents 1 and 2 (husband and wife) purchased this property from the judgment-debtor the respondent No. 3.

3. Subsequently on 4-1-1973 the Margao Court, on an application filed by the decree-holder, issued a certificate transferring the execution of this decree to the civil Court, Quepem. The Quepem Court then issued a show cause




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top