JUDGMENT - V.A. MOHTA, J.:---Constitutionality of section 36-A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (the Code) is questioned in this batch of petitions.

2. The petitioners are all "non-Tribals" who have purchased occupancies from "the Tribals"-a term within the meaning of explanation to sub-section (4) of section 36 of the Code as amended by Act No. XXXV of 1974 (The Act) which was brought into force with effect from 6th July, 1974. All the transfers are subsequent to that date and are undisputedly in violation of section 36-A. The transactions are declared invalid on merits after enquiry. Though feeble attempt was made to challenge these orders there is nothing on record to justify interference under Article 226. What really survives is multi headed attack on section 36-A under Articles 14, 15(4), old Articles 19(1)(f) and 31 and new Article 300-A of the Constitution.

3. Section 36 before its amendment by the Act had put a restriction on transfer of occupancies belonging to certain declared Tribals in favour of non-Tribals. Previous sanction by Collector was a must and in its absence the transaction became voidable at the instance of a tribal who was given a right to apply w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document