SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Bom) 146

A.A.GINWALA
Pundlik Balkrishna Patil & others – Appellant
Versus
Arun Shankar Patil & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - GINWALA, A.A., J.: - This revision application has been filed against the order passed by the learned District Judge, Buldana on 11-8-1982 dismissing the appeal which the present applicants had preferred against the order passed by the trial Court on 30-4-1982 granting temporary injunction in favour of the present non-applicants, restraining the applicants from obstructing them in the user of their way to their field bearing S.No. 31/3 which belongs to the applicants, for going to field S.No. 31/1, which belong to the non-applicants. The suit has been filed by the present non-applicants against the applicants for declaration that they have a right of way to approach their field S.No. 31/1 through the field S.No. 31/3, belonging to the applicants and for a permanent injunction restraining them from obstructing this way. At the same time an application for temporary injunction pending the suit was filed which, as said above, was allowed by the trial Court.

2. Mr. V.M. Kulkarni, the learned Counsel for the applicants, challenged the impugned order of the Appellate Court on three counts. He firstly submitted that the non-applicants had already initiated proceedings under the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top