SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Bom) 126

S.W.PURANIK, H.D.PATEL
Shakuntalabai (Smt. ) w/o Krishna Bhoyar & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra through Collector, Nagpur – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.W. PURANIK, J.:---Both these application---Misc. Civil Application No. 37 of 1986 and Misc. Civil Application No. 36 of 1986, for review of our judgments in First Appeal Nos. 40 of 1979 and 41 of 1979, respectively, decided on 21-11-1984, can be disposed of by a common judgment. Inasmuch as the facts and circumstances in both the applications are identical.

2. Brief facts leading to the present applications may be narrated as follows:

The present applicants are the landowners who were the respondents in the first appeals mentioned above. By a Notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the (Principal Act) issued on 11-2-1970, followed by Notification under section 6 of the Principal Act dated 18-7-1970, 3.74 Acres of land out of Survey No. 83/1 and 3.21 acres of land out of Survey No. 98 both of village Mahadula, Tahsil and Dist, Nagpur, belonging to the applicants were put under acquisition. The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, Panch Project, Nagpur, by an Award dated 28-4-1972, passed in Revenue Code No. 31/A 65/1970-71 granted a total sum of Rs. 1,24,727.85 as compensation. The matter was then referred to the



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top