SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Bom) 89

P.B.SAWANT
Union Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Sunpac Corporation & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - SAWANT P.B., J.: - In accordance with the practice followed so far, the office refuses to admit the plaint since the plaintiff before presenting the plaint had not obtained leave of the Court under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent and insists upon returning the plaint to the plaintiff for fresh presentation after obtaining the said leave.

2. There is no dispute that for filing the suit in question in this Court, leave under the said provision is necessary. The only question to be considered is whether it is necessary for the plaintiff to obtain it before presenting the plaint and whether it will not be a sufficient compliance of the provision if the same is obtained before the plaint is admitted to the register.

3. As per the present practice the plaint is presented to the Prothonotary and Senior Master of this Court who is the officer appointed for the acceptance of the plaint as per Order IX, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code). Then follows the next stage mentioned in Rule 2 of the said Order, namely, the entry of the particulars of the suit in the register of suits and their seriatim numbering according to the order in which the pl





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top