G.D.KAMAT
S. Kapur – Appellant
Versus
Bhalchandra G. Naik & others – Respondent
2. When this matter came for admission, rule was granted and status quo was ordered.
3. From the stances taken by the parties it would be convenient to state facts. On 11th June, 1984 the applicant through his representative filed a complaint against the first respondent at the Mapusa Police Station that respondent No. 1 had removed the truck unlawfully and committed theft of the same. Hence the F.I.R. disclosed an offence under section 379 of Indian Penal Code. It is averred in the petition that the applicant is a proprietor of Yesh Constructions, Bombay and as such the owner of that truck bearing No. MWU 2789, that the responde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.