SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Bom) 142

S.N.KHATRI
Premier Synthetic Processors Ltd. . & others – Appellant
Versus
Roshan F. Chinoy (Dr. ) & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.N. KHATRI, J.:---This is a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the original defendants-tenants.

2. The 1st respondent is the daughter of the 2nd respondent. The former, hereafter referred to as the plaintiff, has been working as an Assistant Pathologist in Tata Memorial Centre, Bombay, since August 1975. She and her mother (2nd respondent) brought a suit in the Small Causes Court, Bombay, in June 1977 for eviction of the petitioners on two grounds under sections 13(1)(g) and 13-A2 of the Bombay Rent Act (hereafter "the Act"). The premises involved are a flat on the 1st floor of 'Amalfi", Napean Road, Bombay. The 1st petitioners are a public limited company (hereinafter for short, 'the company'). The 2nd respondent is their Managing Director. Admittedly under an Agreement of Leave and Licence dated 22nd April, 1971, the suit flat along with a garage was granted by the plaintiff and her mother to the Company for a period of three years from 16th March, 1971 to 15th March, 1974. The Agreement was executed by the 2nd petitioner on behalf of the Company. There is no dispute that the flat was taken for his occupation. As the Licence was admittedly










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top