SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Bom) 234

M.S.DESHPANDE
Nisha Chandrashekhar Khobragade – Appellant
Versus
Chandrashekhar Gopichand Khobragade – Respondent


JUDGMENT - M.S. DESHPANDE, J.:---This revision application is directed against the order passed by the trial Court, refusing to record a compromise between the parties because it did not come within the provisions of section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act.

2. The present applicant-wife had filed a petition under section 13(1)(i)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act for a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty. The husband-present respondent also filed a petition under section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act for a decree of divorce on the ground that the wife had treated him with cruelty.

3. On 12th March, 1986, the parties filed an application stating that without going into the correctness or otherwise of the allegations made by either of them, it was evident that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and they cannot live under one roof and so the marriage should be dissolved by a decree of divorce. Without prejudice to the wife's claim for alimony pendente lite or permanent, the trial Court held that the application was not one which could be entertained under section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and rejected the application.

4. Shri Bhangade, the learned Counsel for the applica











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top