SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Bom) 123

S.C.PRATAP
Jamnadas Madhavji & Company & another – Appellant
Versus
J. B. Panchal, Income Tax Officer & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.P. PRATAP, J.:---The short question with, as I understand, no precedent thereon of this Court-arising for determination in this Article 226 petition is :

Can, in the matter of an assessee's completed and concluded assessments, a summons under section 131(1) of the Income Tax Act (for short, the Act) be issued against him without there being in existence before the officer issuing the same a pending proceeding ?

2. Facts are but few and simple. The first petitioner is a partnership firm engaged in the business of general merchants, exporters and importers of agricultural and other products. The second petitioner is a partner of the first petitioner-firm. The first petitioner (hereafter the assessee) is assessed to income-tax, the financial/accounting year in that behalf being the Samvat Year.

3. The assessee submitted its income-tax returns for the assessment years 1972-73, 1973-74 and 1974-75. Of these, for the assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74 assessment orders were passed on 21st March, 1975 and 14th April, 1975 respectively. Appeals against these orders and further appeals there from to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal were all disposed of finally. For the assessme


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top