SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Bom) 150

S.C.PRATAP
Kamruddin Masjit Trust by its Mutawali Trustee Shaikh Bashir Ismail – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Rahiman Fakiruddin – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.C. PRATAP, J.:---This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution raises a question of some importance and one frequently arising in suits under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947 (for short, the Rent Act) viz.---

Can a rent collector file suit for possession?

2. The suit property is that of a public trust. Claiming to be one of its trustees as also its rent collector, the plaintiff by his own notice terminated the defendant's tenancy and demanded arrears of rent and possession. There was no reply thereto nor compliance with demand made. The plaintiff thereupon filed the instant suit for possession and arrears. The main defence was that the suit was not maintainable because the plaintiff, who claimed to be one of the trustees of the suit trust and/or its rent collector, was not entitled to sue the defendant. The trial Court rejected this defence, held the suit to be maintainable and, on merits, decreed the same. In defendant's appeal therefrom the suit was held to be not maintainable. The appeal was consequently allowed, the trial Court's decree set aside and the suit dismissed. Hence this petition by the plaintiff.

3. Now, on the meri
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top