JUDGMENT - SHARAD MANOHAR, J.:---The only point which the learned Counsel for the appellant succeeded in putting across to the Court was that he is a champion optimist. I will presently mention the nature of optimism.

2. The facts are very simple.

One Dadu Tukaram Navale had the misfortune of not only having large property, but also an unrealistic bent of mind actuating him to adopt a very young boy of 33 years of age, a married man at that time as his adoptive son. This adopting took place on 9-6-1958. Immediately thereafter, on 29-9-1958, application for mutation of the name of the adoptive son, defendant in this case, came to be made for entering his name in the Revenue Record. Entry in that behalf was made in 29-9-1958 and it was certified on 23-12-1958. Dadu did not live long thereafter to experience the curse of penitence in full. He died on 28-4-1959, living behind the present respondent, plaintiff in the suit, and the present appellant defendant in the suit, as his only heirs. As will be presently pointed out, the plaintiff would be having one-half share in the property and her adoptive brother would be having the other half. But she seems to have received peculiar legal adv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document