SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Bom) 174

SHARAD MANOHAR
Shankar Ramchandra Iparkar since deceased by his heirs – Appellant
Versus
Bhanudas Shankar Iparkar & others – Respondent


Judgment

SHARAD MANOHAR, J.:---The appellants before me are the heirs and legal representatives of original defendant No.1, who has filed this appeal against the decree for partition passed by the trial Court in flavour of plaintiffs and defendant No. 4. The original plaintiffs are respondents Nos,1and 2 and original defendant No. 1 is respondent No. 3 before me. Original defendants Nos. 4 to 7 are respondents Nos. 5 to 8 before me. Original defendants Nos. 2 and 3 appear in this appeal is two-fold capacity (i) their individuals capacity (ii) in their capacity of heirs of deceased defendant Nos. 1.

For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants.

2. For understanding the claim of plaintiffs, it is useful referring to the genealogy which is as follow :

Ramchandra Hanmanta Laxman

|

-----------------------------------------------------------------

| |

Shankar Vishwanath

(Deft.No. 1) (Deft.No. 3)

| |

------------------------------------------------------- |

| | | | |

Bhanudas Nivrutti Ganpat Bhaskar |

(Plff. 1) (Plff. 2) (Deft,2) (Deft,3) |

-------------------------------------------

































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top