S.W.PURANIK
Sharadchandra Shripad Marathe – Appellant
Versus
Gurushant Gangadhar Kamble & others – Respondent
2. On perusal of the complaint allegations and without recording any verification statement of the complainant, who is a public servant. The learned Magistrate was satisfied that there was a prima facie case against the petitioner accused No. 17 and has issued process according to law. The petitioner, however, challenges issuance of process on several grounds.
3. Before I appreciate the submissions of the counsel on either side the brief facts as alleged in the complaint may be stated as follows :
The first respondent-complainant is the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Pune. Original accused No. 1 is M/s Kirloskar Brothers Limited, while accused No. 2 is the Chairman and a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.