V.A.MOHTA
Madhukar S/o Abaji Kalbande & others – Appellant
Versus
Mangalchand S/o Mannalal Agrawal & others – Respondent
2. In order to ascertain which of the two provisions are attracted, it is necessary to set out what in substance is the claim made: The plaintiffs are tenants of a block in a Chawl in Peshve plot, Yavatmal. The property was taken on lease from Dongaonkars who executed a sale-deed dated 28-12-1981, in favour of non applicants Nos. 2 to 4 (defendants Nos. 2 to 4). The house is let out for residential purposes and is governed by the local Rent Control Order, Non-applicant No. 1 (defendant No. 1) was serving as a Civil Surgeon, Yavatmal. He was staying in a Government Bungalow. Defendant No. 2 is his wife, defendant No. 3 is his son and defendant No. 4 is his brother-in-law. The property is in fact purchased by defendant No. 1 but Sale-deed has been taken benami in the name of defendants Nos. 2 to 4 solely with 3 view to make out a case before the Rent Controller f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.