SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Bom) 396

M.M.QAZI, A.A.DESAI
Manohar son of Mukundrao Deshpande – Appellant
Versus
Menkabai (Smt. ) wife of Mukundrao Brahmin & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.A. DESAI, J.:---This Letters Patent Appeal raises a question of substantial importance as to whether the right to claim partition of a dwelling house, accrued in favour of a Hindu widow under sub-section (3) of section 3 of the Hindu Woman's Right to Property Act of 1937 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1937') has been placed under suspension on coming into force section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act of 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1956'). The facts giving rise to the question are as under :---

2. Late Mukundrao Deshpande was a member of a coparcenary. His coparcenary had inherited ancestral property including moveable and immoveable. Late Mukundrao died intestate in 1951 leaving behind his widow Menkabai (Plaintiff) and sons (defendants). They on 30-12-1954, vide Ex. 91, partitioned only agricultural land of the coparcenary and thereunder 1/5th share was allotted to the plaintiff. They, however, preferred to maintain the jointness of rest of the property.

3. The plaintiff on 20-8-1959 filed a suit claiming a declaration for setting aside the partition dated 30-12-1954. She alleged that her consent for partition was obtained by fraud. She further c




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top