SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Bom) 196

M.L.PENDSE, P.S.SHAH
Gandhi & Co. – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Glass Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT - SHAH P.S., J.: - This is an appeal preferred by the original plaintiffs against the judgment and order dated March 22, 1983, passed by the learned Single Judge in Suit No. 17 of 1973 dismissing the suit on the preliminary ground that the suit is not maintainable for non-compliance of the provisions of section 69, sub-section (2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The facts in so far as they are material are not in dispute. In the plaint the appellants are described as a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act and carrying on business at 90/92, Kazi Syed Street, Bombay 3. In the plaint it is further averred that the plaintiffs are a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act and that they carry on the business of supply of silica sand, dolomite limestone and other minerals. In para 7 of the plaint it is stated that there was a talk in relation to the suit contract between Rasiklal Narottam Gandhi, a partner of the plaintiffs-firm and one Dhirubhai Boda who was connected with the respondent company. The plaint is signed by Rasiklal Gandhi on behalf of the appellants firm. He has also verified the plaint as a partner of the plaintiff

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top