SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Bom) 61

S.M.DAUD
V. P. S. Gill – Appellant
Versus
Air India and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.M. DAUD, J.:---This petition invokes the writ jurisdiction to quash a “ no flying” order and to restore all benefits of which the petitioner has been deprived as a consequence thereof.

2. Respondent No. 2, the Union of India, owns and operates the 1st respondent which shall hereinafter be referred to as ' the Air India' or ' Corporation'. Petitioner is a pilot who served the Indian Air Force from 1962 to 1976 and for distinguished service received the Vayu Sena Medal in 1971. In 1976 he joined the Air India and until mid 1984 underwent the usual progression. Come June 1984 and the entry of the Army into the Golden Temple on 6th June, 1984. Agitated by this entry, the petitioner addressed a letter on 10th June, 1984 to the Dadar Gurudwara Prabhandak Samiti to forward his protest and the return of the Vayu Sena Medal to the Governor of Maharashtra. The letter emphasised petitioner's not being actuated by political considerations and his aversion to the protest being actuated by political considerations and his aversion to the protest being publicised. The caution notwithstanding, the protest found its way into the press. Four days later i.e. on 14 June, 19



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top