JUDGMENT - H.W. DHABE, J.:---All the parties including the added parties were heard by us at length on merits and hence the instant letters patent appeal can be conveniently disposed of at this stage only. Hence, Rule, Heard forthwith.

2. The proceedings in this letters patent appeal arise out to the orders passed under the provisions of the C.P. Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 (for short "the Rent Control Order"). The respondent Nos. 1 to 3 filed an application before the Rent Controller under Clauses 13(3)(i), (ii) and (vi) of the Rent Control Order seeking permission to give quit notice to the appellant No. 1, which was the tenant in the suit premises. The appellant No. 1 is a registered partnership firm. By its written statement the appellant No. 1 denied the allegation made by respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in their application. After the written statement to add to the original application, Shri S. Narsingrao Kedari, as non-applicant No. 2 on the ground that it was necessary to sue the firm through one of the partners in view of the decision of this Court. The said application for amendment was allowed and S. Narsingrao Kedari, one of the partners of the firm,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document