SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Bom) 75

R.A.JAHAGIRDAR, T.D.SUGLA
Yeshwant Gajanan Joshi & others – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.A. JAHAGIRDAR, J.:---These petitions involve common questions of law and fact and are, therefore, being disposed of by this common judgement.

2. First we will narrate the facts in Writ Petition No. 269 of 1985. The petitioners in the petition contend that two awards were made in Compensation Cases Nos. 22 of 1984 and 23 of 1984 by the Competent Authority under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right User in Land) Act, 1962, hereinafter referred to as "the Act". Theses awards, which are made on 18th of July 1984 and 10th of July 1984 respectively, directed payment of certain sums as compensation to the petitioners, but the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., which is respondent No., is not paying compensation as per the said awards. Hence this petition, asking for a writ of mandamus requiring respondent No. 1, hereinafter referred to as "the Corporation" to pay to the petitioners the amounts of compensation as per the awards. Respondent No. 2 in this petition is the Competent Authority.

3. By issuing certain notifications as contemplated under the Act, the Corporation acquired the right of user of the lands of the petitioners, leading the petitioners
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top