SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Bom) 10

B.LENTIN, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Podar Mills Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
J. K. Synthetics Ltd – Respondent


JUDGMENT - SUJATA MANOHAR, J.:---The present appeal is from an order dismissing Judge's Summons taken out by the appellants for stay of all further proceedings in Company Petition No. 352 of 1983 and for restraining the respondents from taking any further steps in the Company Petition.

2. On 23rd June, 1983 the respondents filed a petition for winding up the Appellant Company. On 14th September, 1983 consent terms were filed in Company Petition under which, inter alia, the Appellant Company admitted the claim of the respondents and agreed to pay the claim amount by monthly instalments. Under Clause 4 of the consent terms it was provided as follows:

“4. In the event of the Company failing to pay any three instalments or the last instalment on its due date as mentioned hereinabove the petition do stand admitted and the petitioners to give advertisement thereof in the “Free Press Journal”, Bombay Samachar and Maharashtra Government Gazette. The petition to be made returnable four weeks after the last advertisement is published.”

The first Instalment became payable on 20th September, 1983. This instalment was sent by the appellants along with their registered letter on 21st September, 198


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top