SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Bom) 353

A.C.AGARWAL
Satyabhamabai @ Bhamabai Bhr. Gangadhar Phopse – Appellant
Versus
Sakharam Dada Phopse – Respondent


JUDGMENT - ASHOK AGARWAL, J.:---The Execution Application of the appellant decree holder having been dismissed, the decree - holder has filed the present appeal. She had filed Special Civil Suit No. 13 of 1966 for partition and separate possession in respect of half share in the property left behind by her deceased husband Gangadhar wherein the judgement-debtor, the brother of Gangadhar had other half share. On the 31st January, 1967 a preliminary decree was passed whereunder she was held to be entitled to half share and the judgement-debtor was held to be entitled to the other half. When she filed the present Darkhast, Notice under Order 21, Rule 22 was issued and the judgement -debtor resisted the said Darkhast contending that in Special Civil Suit No. 5 of 1969 filed by Gangubai and Rakhamabai, the sisters of Gangadhar, it was held that each of them had 1/3rd share whereas the judgement-debtor in the present Darkhast 1/3rd share. In view of the subsequent decree to which the decree- holder was a party, the decree - holder was not entitled to execute the decree in her previous Special Civil Suit No. 13 of 1966. The said contention of the present judgement-debtor having found favo




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top