SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Bom) 30

SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Garware Plastics & Polyster Ltd. . & others – Appellant
Versus
Telelink & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Mrs. SUJATA MANOHAR, J.:---The plaintiffs in Suit No. 87 of 1989 claim to be the Assignees of a copyright in relation to Cinematograph Films listed in the plaint to be shown on T.V. screen by means of video cassettes, disc and/or tapes of such films. This is popularly known as 'Video Copyright'. The suit is filed by the plaintiffs in a representative capacity on behalf of persons who hold an assignment of Video copyrights in respect of cinematograph films.

2. The plaintiffs in Suit No. 151 of 1989 are the producers of cinematograph films, who have retained with themselves the video copyrights in respects of such films. Some of these producers have granted the right of telecasting their films to the Government of India or Doordarshan but have retained with themselves the right to telecast films, inter alia, by Cable T.V.

3. These two suits have been filed against various persons who obtain video cassettes of cinematograph films from the market and show video films over a Cable T.V. network which they have set up in various houses, apartments or localities for a fee which they call, 'maintenance charges'. Any person whose T.V. network which they have set up in various houses





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top