SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Bom) 381

H.SURESH
Yogendra Patwardhan – Appellant
Versus
Khandelwal Hermann Electronics Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT - H. SURESH, J.:---This revision application is filed by the defendant against an order, on a Summons for Judgement, granting conditional leave to defend, on deposit of the full amount of claim in the suit.

2. The plaintiffs had employed the present petitioner as a sales engineer under a letter of appointment dated January 6, 1986. While in service the plaintiffs came to know that there was to be a fair in West Germany. The plaintiff decided to send some of their workmen and personnel to the said fair. It is the plaintiffs' case that before selecting the personnel to attend the fair, it was made clear to each person including the defendant that the plaintiffs were sending their employees to the said fair with the sole object of acquiring the know-how for the benefit of the plaintiffs company and with that object in mind the plaintiff informed them that they would be spending large amounts for the said tour, per person. The plaintiff desired that the persons who acquired such knowledge should remain with the plaintiffs Company for a minimum period of one year. As a guarantee for the same, apart from individual oral assurance, the plaintiffs had requested the defendant and ot















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top