SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Bom) 245

G.H.GUTTAL
Bank of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
M. V. River Ogbese, a Vessel & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - G.H. GUTTAL, J.:---This notice of motion raises a question relating to the practice on the original side of this Court.

2. The ship M.V. 'RIVER OGBESE' was arrested pursuant to the warrant of arrest dated 27th May, 1989. The arrest was 'confirmed" by the order dated 30th June, 1989 made on the plaintiffs ' Notice of Motion No. 958 of 1989. This Notice of Motion by the defendant No. 3 is for an order of release of the ship.

3. The Bank of Maharashtra have instituted this suit for a decree compelling the defendants to deliver the consignment in accordance with the contract of carriage. The suit was instituted on 10th March, 1989. The plaintiffs filed application on 10th March, 1989, for arrest of the ship. It was accompanied by an affidavit in support of the order of arrest. The draft order or arrest was also placed in the proceedings. The plaintiffs did not press the application for arrest of the ship. On 10th March, 1989, an ad-interim order was passed in accordance with the minutes presented by the parties. No order of arrest was made. Nothing happened until 27th May, 1989, when the suit was brought before Kenia, J., by the Defendant No. 3 with a prayer that the Defendant






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top