SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Bom) 111

P.V.NIRGUDKAR, B.N.DESHMUKH
Vinayak Pralhadrao Naik & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.N. DESHMUKH, J.:---These petitions are filed by the students who were admitted by different institutions who were not granted recognition by the Government of Maharashtra. These students were admitted for D.Ed. course and were allowed to continue and prosecute their studies throughout the year. Their examination forms are not accepted by the Commissioner and Bureau of Government Examinations (respondent No. 6 in Writ Petition No. 489 of 1989). The ground given for not accepting the examination forms is that the institutions which admitted these and similar students were not recognised by the State Government and the admissions are given by the managements without having obtained any proper recognition, therefore, the admissions of these and other students are illegal.

2. Apart from this, a communication is also addressed to the management by Exhibit F-1 dated 1-2-1989 (in Writ Petition No. 489 of 1989) that the management will be prosecuted for admitting students illegally without obtaining proper permission or recognition from the competent authority. In this letter, it was also mentioned that their act constitutes a criminal offence and will be dealt with accordingly.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top