SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Bom) 77

I.G.SHAH
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Sampatlal Nonsukh Bothara – Respondent


JUDGMENT - I.J. SHAH, J.:---The State has come in appeal against the order of sentence passed against the present respondent, the Original Accused, in Summary Case Nos. 4073/77, 4071/77 and 4072/77 for enhancement of the sentence of fine of Rs. 5/- levied by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmednagar.

2. As in all these three appeals the Appellant-accused is the same and the contravention alleged is also same, they are being disposed of by a common judgment.

3. Briefly stated facts giving rise to these three appeals are that on 9-2-1977 Factory Inspector visited Bothara Engineering Works, a factory belonging to the present Respondent and found that Jaywant Pund, Sudhakar Shinde and Murlidhar Karale were working in the factory but their names were not entered as workers in the register as required by section 62 of the Factories Act. The Factories Inspector, therefore, filed three separate complaints in respects of each of the workers in the Court. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate on strength of the evidence before him found that the complainant proved that the present Respondent had contravened the provisions of section 62 of the Factories Act and, therefore, have committe





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top