SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Bom) 38

A.C.AGARWAL
Vishwanath Sawant – Appellant
Versus
Gandabhai Kikabhai – Respondent


JUDGMENT - ASHOK AGARWAL, J.:---Whether the defendant is a rank trespasser or a licensee, if he is a licensee whether his possession is protected under the Bombay Rent Act; whether the City Civil Court or the Court of Small Causes under section 41 of the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act or under section 28 of the Bombay Rent Act has jurisdiction are some of the questions which have been debated before me in the present Appeal.

2. The present suit has been instituted by one Daulatrai Mohanlal Kothari acting as the Constituted Attorney of the plaintiff. By this suit, the plaintiff seeks to recover possession of the suit premises being Room No. 10, Noor Mahal, now known as Baughwala Mahal at 125/127, Sir Ratan Tata Road, Tardeo, Bombay - 400 034.

3. Shortly stated it is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant is in unauthorised use and occupation of the suit premises. The defendant however, claims to be the plaintiff's licensee in respect thereof. According to the plaintiff, the defendant had forcibly entered into the suit premises in or about 1979 and had refused to remove himself although called upon to vacate the same. According to the plaintiff, he is a tenant in respect of t


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top