SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Bom) 49

R.A.JAHAGIRDAR, R.G.SINDHAKAR
Ravikant Patil – Appellant
Versus
Director General of Police & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.A. JAHAGIRDAR, J.:---This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with a murder of one Ganesh Kolekar, which took place in Solapur on 2nd August, 1989. The petition seeks to censure the 3rd and 4th respondents for the action which they have taken against the petitioner, described hereinafter in greater details. The 1st respondent is the Director General of Police, while the 2nd respondent is this judgment because ultimately what we are called upon to decide is whether the action of the 4th respondent in such as to merit censure and also such as to result in the payment of compensation to the petitioner. The 3rd respondent is the Superintendent of Police. According to the petitioner, the Acts complainted of by the petitioner against the 4th respondent were at the instance of the 3rd respondent. After going through the material on record, it has not been possible for us to accept the case of the petitioner that it was at the instance and the behest of the 3rd respondent that the 4th respondent committed the Acts of which complaint has been made in this petition. Hence, we will also not be r

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top