V.A.MOHTA, M.B.GHODESWAR
Golchha Advertising Agency – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another – Respondent
2. On 10th January, 1987 this Court had issued notice before admission to ascertain facts and to show cause as to why proceedings of contempt should not be initiated. The respondents-the State of Maharashtra and the executive Engineer-filled submissions explaining the factual back ground and stoutly denying the allegations of disobedience of any order passed by this Court. They opposed initiation of proceedings of contempt on merits as well as on the ground of limitation. The objection on the ground of limitation is based on section 20th of the Act. Considering the plain language used therein and crystalized legal positions regarding basic approach to the law relating to contempt of Courts, it seems to us that the said objection has to be up held. Section 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.