SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Bom) 226

SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Lalita D. Nadkarni & others – Appellant
Versus
S. G. Punjabi – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Mrs. SUJATA MANOHAR, J.:---One Dr. D.S. Nadkarni was the owner of Plot No. 11-C of Town Planning Scheme II of Andheri and the late Mrs. Manorama Y. Ambiye, was the owner of the adjoining plot being Plot No. 11-A of the same scheme. The owners of the said two plots entered into an agreement on 14th May 1957 under which they leased the said plot on monthly basis to the father of the first respondent. The petitioners are the successors-in-title of Dr. Nadkarni and Mrs. Ambiye while the First Respondent is the successor-in-title of his father. The tenancy in favour of the first respondent in respect of the plots was terminated by a notice dated 2nd October 1970.

2. Thereafter on 10th of August 1971 R.A.E. Suit No. 3866 of 1971 was filed in the Court of Small Causes at Bombay for eviction of the first respondent from the said plots and for possession. The first respondent was represented by an Advocate in the suit. He filed his written statement. Issues were framed on 22nd July 1976. It seems that on 28th June 1977 the Advocate of the first respondent withdrew his appearance for want of instructions.

3. From the end of 1978 onwards there were negotiations between the parties fo



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top