H.SURESH
Kishore H. Desai – Appellant
Versus
Lilawati Virji Chheda and others – Respondent
2. Now to certain minimum facts. In fact, the litigation between the parties and the way it has multiplied reminds one of what Lord Simon once said: "The bitter waters would never ebb", (Re Ampthill Pearage case)1, (1976) 2 All E.R. 411, (at P 438). So much so, Mr. Dave informs me that the petitioners have been filing their caveats once in three months in all the three Courts, the Small Causes Court, the Bombay City Civil Court and the High Court for the last few years. It all began in October 1981 when the landlord (the deceased father of respondent Nos. 1 to 5) filed a suit as against the tenant (deceased father of petitioner No. 1) being R.A.E. Suit No. 1317/4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.