SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Bom) 286

SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Makarand Krishnaji Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Sadashiv Vithal Joshi – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Mrs. SUJATA MANOHAR, J.:---The petitioner filed a Civil Suit in the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangli on 2nd November, 1981 for recovery from the respondent of a sum of Rs. 17.516 49 P. together with interest. The petitioner made an application being Miscellaneous Application No. 179 of 1981 for being permitted to file the suit in forma pauperis. It seems that this application took a very long time for disposal. The application was fixed for hearing on 5-9-1985. On that day the petitioner was absent. It is his case that he had applied for an adjournment on the ground that he was required to be elsewhere for his business, but he learnt on that day that one of his relatives was seriously ill and was admitted to the hospital. Hence he was required to attend on him at the hospital.

2. In his absence the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Sangli dismissed his application for default.

3. The petitioner applied for setting aside the order of dismissal for default, under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This application, however, was dismissed. Thereafter the petitioner preferred an appeal from this order of dismissal for default being Misc. Civ












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top