JUDGMENT - G.H. GUTTAL, J.:---The petitioner who was a lecturer in Sanskrit in Ayurved College, Sion, Bombay, impugns the legality of the Order dated 9th December, 1986, made by the College Tribunal, Bombay, in Appeal No. 28 of 1986, confirming the termination of her services by the respondents Nos. 1 2 who are, respectively, the Principal and the Management of the College. The respondents Nos. 3, 4 5 are respectively the University of Bombay, the Director of Ayurved, Maharashtra State, and the State of Maharashtra. The respondent No. 6 is a lecturer in Sanskrit appointed in the place of the petitioner.

2. The admitted facts may be, briefly, set out :

Pursuant to the advertisement dated 13th October, 1983, and after interviewing the petitioner, the respondents Nos. 1 2 appointed her as lecturer in Sanskrit. She worked from 19-3-1984 to 30-4-1984, as her appointment was specifically for this duration. A second advertisement was published on 12-11-1983 for the year 1984-85 inviting applications for the post of lecturer in Sanskrit. In 1984-85, the petitioner was once again interviewed selected and appointed for this post where she worked from 21-8-1984 to 19-4-1985. Pursuant to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document