SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Bom) 83

A.A.DESAI
Babulal & others – Appellant
Versus
Shantabai widow of Hari Dekate – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.A. DESAI, J.:---This appeal raises the questions as to whether :---

A. Members of the tribes notified by the Constitutional (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950, (hereinafter referred to "the order of 1950") are deemed to be scheduled tribe regardless of the area specified in relation to them for the purposes of exception as provided under sub-section (2) of section 2 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to "the Act of 1956) ?

B. The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Order (Amendment) Act of 1976 (hereinafter referred to the Act of 1976) being a declaratory Statute, operates retrospectively ?

2. The plaintiff Shantabai married to late Hari. She was his second wife. She gave birth to daughter Suman. Hari died in 1961. Suman died in 1966. Defendants Nos. 1 and 2 are respectively brother and mother of Hari. Defendant No. 3 Smt. Chindhi is a daughter of Hari from first wife.

The parties have been the residents of District Wardha which is within the region known as Vidarbha. The region was a part of the erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh.

3. According to the plaintiff, Ramnath father of Hari, died in 1947 leaving behind him the property more specifically describ





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top