SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Bom) 345

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
S.M. Daud R.G. Sindhakar, JJ.
Narayan Deoji Koli ... Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra others ... Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 2141 of 1987, decided on 23-11-1989.
Advocates appeared :
C.J. Sawant, for petitioner.
V.A. Gangal, A.G.P. for respondents (absent.)

A Commissioner appointed under a Government Resolution has no jurisdiction to verify caste certificates issued prior to the date of the Resolution, to ignore evidence of blood relations, to give undue weightage to a school leaving certificate, or to review or vary an order passed by the Government.

Headnote:

CASTE CERTIFICATE - RECTIFICATION - GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION NO. CBC-1680/43669/D-V DATED 29 OCTOBER, 1980 - Retrospective effect - Commissioner's jurisdiction to verify certificates issued prior to 29 October, 1980 - Evidence of blood relations - School leaving certificate - Government's decision - Commissioner's power to review or vary.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner, a government employee, applied for rectification of his caste record from Suryawanshi Koli to Mahadeo Koli, a scheduled tribe. The request was granted in 1976. In 1982, the Director of Tribes Research and Training Institute, Pune, asked the petitioner to appear for caste verification. The Commissioner, Konkan Division, held that the petitioner did not belong to the Mahadeo Koli tribe and directed the Executive Magistrate to cancel the caste certificate issued to him.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to verify certificates issued prior to 29 October, 1980, as the Government Resolution (G.R.) No. CBC-1680/43669/D-V dated 29 October, 1980, was prospective in operation and not retrospective. The court also held that the Commissioner erred in ignoring the evidence of the petitioner's blood relations, who were Mahadeo Kolis, and in giving undue weightage to the school leaving certificate, which was not the last word on the subject. The court further held that the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to review or vary an order passed by the Government.

Issues: 1. Whether the Commissioner had jurisdiction to verify certificates issued prior to 29 October, 1980? 2. Whether the Commissioner erred in ignoring the evidence of the petitioner's blood relations? 3. Whether the Commissioner erred in giving undue weightage to the school leaving certificate? 4. Whether the Commissioner had jurisdiction to review or vary an order passed by the Government?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The G.R. No. CBC-1680/43669/D-V dated 29 October, 1980, was prospective in operation and not retrospective, as evidenced by the presumption against retrospective legislation, the words "these orders shall come into force with immediate effect" in Clause 11, and the reference to appeals in respect of non-issuance of caste certificates and complaints about issuance of caste certificates to persons who do not belong to Scheduled Tribes in Clause 6. 2. Evidence of blood relations is relevant and cannot be overlooked in determining a person's caste or tribe. 3. A school leaving certificate is not the last word on the subject of a person's caste or tribe and cannot prevail over other evidence. 4. The Commissioner, being a subordinate of the Government, had no jurisdiction to review or vary an order passed by the Government.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed. The Commissioner's order was quashed, and the Government was directed to restore the petitioner's caste record as Mahadeo Koli.

JUDGMENT - S.M. DAUD, J.:---This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution takes exception to the decision of the Commissioner, Konkan Division, in an appeal said to fall under the provisions of Government Resolution No. CBC-1680/43669/D-V dated 29 October, 1980.

2. Petitioner joined service as Junior Assistant in the Rehabilitation Housing and Backward Classes Department of the Government of Maharashtra at Mantralaya in October 1955. He was transferred to the Labour and Social Welfare Department on the 1st November, 1955. Then he came to Education and Social Welfare Department and on 10 March, 1966 was promoted as a Superintendent. After returning from the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, a Government under taking to which he had been deputed, he was posted in the social welfare Cultural Affairs, Sports and Tourism Department. Petitioner was thereafter promoted as an Assistant Secretary on 1 April, 1955. Then came a second deputation to the Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation, where he worked as a Junior Executive. Came another promotion as an under Secretary in the General Administration Department on 9 August 1977. On 2 March, 1982, petitioner was promoted and posted as a Deputy Secretary in the Legislative Affairs Department, Mantralaya. He was thereafter transferred to the General Administration Department and there, he earned another promotion as a Joint Secretary and it is in that post that he is presently working. Initially recruited as one from an other Backward Community, the petitioner on 7 June, 1976 applied to the Chief Secretary through the Secretary of the Department in which he was then stationed, for rectification of the official record vis-a-vis his caste. The claim made in the application was that he had been recruited as a Suryawanshi Koli, whereas in fact he was a Mahadeo Koli which was a scheduled Tribe. The request made by the petitioner was acceded to vide Government Memorandum dated 9 July, 1976. The 5th respondent who is the Director of Tribas Research and Training Institute, Pune, addressed a letter to the petitioner on 11 May, 1982, requiring the petitioner to appear before him for the verification of his caste. Petitioner took objection to the process of re-verification. He did appear before the Scrutiny Committee and furnished additional information to support the claim of his being the member of Mahadeo Kolis, being a scheduled tribe. What exactly happened at the level of the 5th respondent is not known. The Commissioner, Konkan Division, who is the 2nd respondent to this petition, addressed a letter to the petitioner calling upon him to appear before him. Petitioner appeared before the said respondent and raised various submission. A detailed written representation was submitted by him. The documents tendered by him included a School Leaving Certificate, a Caste Certificate issued by the Executive Magistrate, Thane, Government memorandum dated 9 July, 1976 spoken of above, an abstract from the service book of the petitioner, primary and secondary school certificates of the petitioner's sister, caste certificates issued by three M.L. As testifying to the petitioner being a member of the Mehadeo Koli tribe, certain Government letter relating to his relations and affidavits of these relations. The 2nd respondent was unconvinced and on 29 January, 1987 passed the impugned order, the operative part whereof is worded as follows :

"In view of the above facts, I come to the conclusion that Shri N.D. Koli (petitioner) does not establish his caste claim as belonging to Mahadeo Koli by sound and reliable documentary evidence and that he does not belong to mahadeo Koli as notified as Scheduled Tribe. I hold that the caste certificate issued to Shri N.D. Koli by the Executive Magistrate, Thane, as invalid and further direct that the executive Magistrate should take further action to cancel this caste certificate."

3. The contentions raised in this petition, are dealt with below :







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top