SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Bom) 523

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
(NAGPUR BENCH)
B.U. Wahane, J.
Shivaji s/o Shrawan Khairnar another ... Appellants.
Versus
State of Maharashtra ... Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 111 of 1987, decided on 31-10-1991.
Advocates appeared :
Manohar, for the appellants.
Naikh, P.P. for the respondent.

The weight of the prosecutrix's evidence in cases of sexual assault and the absence of a legal requirement for corroboration, as well as the interpretation of the elements of abduction and rape under the Indian Penal Code.

Headnote:

JUDGMENT - appeal - sections 366, 376 of I.P.C. - summary of acts and sections referenced and discussed by the court

Fact of the Case:

The prosecutrix, originally from Uran, left her parents' house to meet her lover in Bangalore. Instead, she met the accused No. 1 Shivaji and got married to another man, Liladhar. Later, the accused induced her to leave her in-laws' house by falsely claiming her mother was ill.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused No. 1 Shivaji guilty of committing rape against the prosecutrix and inducing her to leave her in-laws' house. The accused No. 2 Eknath was acquitted of the charges.

Issues: The issues included the credibility of the prosecutrix's testimony, the consent in the sexual intercourse, and the accused's role in inducing the prosecutrix to leave her in-laws' house.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the evidence of the prosecutrix, the corroborating testimony of the Bus Conductor, and the observations of the Supreme Court regarding the weight of the prosecutrix's evidence in cases of sexual assault.

Final Decision: The conviction and sentence of accused No. 1 Shivaji were confirmed, while accused No. 2 Eknath was acquitted. The appeal was partly allowed.

JUDGMENT - B.U. WAHANE, J.:---This appeal is directed against the judgment and Order passed by Shri D.U. Khan, Addl. Sessions Judge, Nagpur on 9th April 1987, in Sessions Case No. 220/1984, convicting both the accused (appellants) for the offence pubnishable under section 366 of I.P.C. and sentencing them to undergo R.I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- each in default of payment of fine each of the accused shall undergo R.I. for one month. The appellant/accused No. 1 further convicted for the offence punishable under section 376 of I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 300/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo further R.I. for 3 months.

2. Both the appellants/accused were chargesheeted and tired for the offence punishable under sections 366, 376 of I.P.C. for kidnapping Smt. Ranjana W/o Liladhar or abducting Srimati Ranjana w/o Liladhar with intent that she may be forced or seduced to illicit inter-course and committing rape on her.

3. The facts giving rise to the prosecution are as follows :---

The prosecutrix Smt. Ranjana w/o Liladhar (P.W. 11) is originally resident of Uran in Raigarh District. She was residing there with her parents. The appellant/accused No. 1 Shivaji is wellknown to Smt. Ranjana as his house being just near the house of her parents. The accused No. 1 Shivaji is also a resident of Uran. It is also transpired from the evidence that the accused No. 1 Shivaji had occupied the house of Smt. Ranjana's paternal uncle as a tenant. The appellant/accused No. 2 Eknath is a resident of Nashik and a friend of appellant/accused No. 1 Shivaji.

It is transpired in the evidence of the prosecutrix Smt. Ranjana that she being in love with one Krishna for the last 2 years who was residing at Banglore, she left her parent's house on 23-5-84. At Uran she met the accused No. 1 Shivaji and requested him to reach her to Panvel. He acceded her request and reached her to Panvel on his motor-cycle. From there the prosecutrix had gone to Bombay to catch the train or bus bound for Banglore. She halted at Dadar as no train was available for Banglore. She went to Pune by S.T. Bus. At Pune too there being no direct Bus for Banglore she went to Railway Station. She purchased a ticket for Banglore but her train was scheduled for Banglore in the mid-night. She happened to meet Shri Liladhar on the Railway Platform who extended help and co-operation to the prosecutrix. At Railway Station she narrated her story to Shri Liladhar and also informed him that two goondas are following her.

Apprehending danger to her life or honour at the hands of goondas, Shri Liladhar asked her to accompany with up to Bhusawal from where he will board her in the train for Banglore. Liladhar also informed her that he is proceeding to Nagpur and Bhusawal is on the way. As Nagpur bound train came earlier than Banglore bound, she accompanied with Liladhar.

At Bhusawal, Liladhar made enquiries whether any train goes to Banglore as well as its, scheduled time to proceed. However, the prosecutrix and Liladhar were informed that no train goes from Bhusawal to Banglore. Shri Liladhar requested her to accompany with him to Nagpur from where she would be in a position to catch the train for Banglore. As the prosecutrix also found her life safe in the company of Liladhar, she went to Nagpur along with him. Both reached at Nagpur on 24-5-84 at 4 or 5 p.m. Banglore train was in the mid-night. She purchaseda ticket. But as the departure of Banglore bound train was in mid-night, Liladhar requested the prosecutrix Smt. Rajana, instead of sitting on the platform till mid-night, to accompany with him to sister's house which is at Moti-bag Nagpur. Thus, she accompanied Liladhar and gone to the house of Liladhar's sister. The prosecutrix instead of going to Banglore she stayed for the whole night in the house of Liladhar's sister. On the next morning, the uncle of Liladhar came to the house of his sister and after some talk, put a


























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top