SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Bom) 88

G.D.KAMAT, E.S.DA SILVA
Vishvanath Putu Chipkar & others – Appellant
Versus
Mormugao Port Trust by its Chairman & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - G.D. KAMAT, J.:---The petitioners and respondents Nos. 3 to 6 are the employees of Mormugao Port Trust, the first respondent. Mormugao Port is a Major Port under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963. Under section 3 thereof the Central Government constitutes a Board of Trustees for that port consisting of a Chairman, a Deputy Chairman and not more than 19 persons.

2. The petitioners were initially appointed as Clerks between the period 1964 to 1966 and promoted as Senior Clerks in 1972-1973. Respondents Nos. 3 and 4 were appointed as Clerks in the year 1979, respondent No. 5 in 1982 and respondent No. 6 in 1983 and subsequently promoted is Senior Clerks.

The next promotion for a Senior Clerks is that of Accountant. According to the petitioners based on seniority and otherwise nothing adverse found, they are liable to be promoted as Accountants, as on 31st August, 1987, respondent Nos. 4 and 5 on 5th September, 1988 and respondent No. 6 ad-hoc basis on 28th October, 1988. It is now set out that respondents Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 though junior to the petitioners were promoted to the posts of Accountants out of turn they belong to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe.

3. Section 28 of the





































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top