SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Bom) 310

D.N.MEHTA, M.F.SALDANHA
Leela Mahadeo Joshi (Prof. ) – Appellant
Versus
Mahadeo Sitaram Joshi (Dr. ) – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.N. Mehta, J.:---This First Appeal has come up before us for admission. However, on the application of the learned advocates for the appellant as well as the respondent that thr matter be admitted and finally disposed of at this stage, we have complied with their request. The appellant in this First Appeal impugns the judgment and Order passed by the learned judge, Family Court, Bombay. Dated 18-7-1990, whereunder a joint petition of the appellant and the respondent for a divorce by mutual consent under section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was dismissed.

2. The brief facts are that the appellant and the respondent were married according to Hindu Vedic Rites on 5-12-1956. On 28-7-1960, the appellant gave birth to a son named Satish. The parties lived together happily till December 1986. However, in December 1986, the respondent suffered certain financial losses in his business as a result of which disputes and dissensions arose between the appellant and the respondent, and they decided to live separately. It is the evidence of the respondent that he and his wife have been living separately for about five years prior to the filing of the petition.

3. On 26-10-19




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top