SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Bom) 431

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Mrs. Sujata Manohar M.F. Saldanha, JJ.
American Refrigerator Company Ltd.... Petitioners.
Versus
Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Respondent.
Writ Petition No. 291 of 1983, decided on 30-10-1990.
Advocates appeared :
S.M. Gorwadkar with N.B. Shah. for the petitioners.
P..S. Patankar, for the respondent.

Headnote:Section 142-Account current facilities given to petitioners by Municipal Corporation for payment of octroi duty-Letter written by corporation to petitioners that on checking of their accounts July 1982 for period 73-74 upto March 1982 amount of Rs. 26747 was payable by them by way of octroi Petitioners were called upon to pay said amount-Writ filed for setting aside demand-Corporation required Under Section 142 to settle accounts at intervals of one month instead of inspecting records for period of about 9 years-Held No period of limitation prescribed within which recovery proceedings have to be taken-Even so maximum indulgence that can be given to respondents in this connection cannot extend a reasonable time which is a period of three years from date when account current is required to be settled as per Section 142 Accordingly demand made in so far as it pertains to period prior to 30tb August, 1979 is set aside-Claim for the period after 30tb August, 1979 can be entertained.

JUDGMENT - Mrs. SUJATA MANOHAR, J.:---The petitioners are a company registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having their registered office at Calcutta. The petitioners have a factory at Pune. The 1st respondent is a Municipal Council established under section 8 of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965. The area where the petitioners' said factory is situate is under the jurisdiction of the 1st respondent Municipal Council. By a notification dated 11th October, 1982 the said Municipal Council has been converted into a Municipal Corporation under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. At all times material to the present petition, the respondent was a Municipal Council under the provisions of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965.

2. The petitioners manufacture hydraulic equipment such as punches, shears, mobile fabricators, N.B.C. open throat presses and hydraulic cylinders in the factory at Pune. The raw material required for the manufacture of these items consists of steel plates, C.I. castings, hydrolic punches etc. This raw material is imported by the petitioners into the limits of the respondent Council from outside and the petitioners are liable to pay octroi in respect of the material so imported.

3. Under section 142 of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 it is provided as follows:

"A Council, if it thinks fit, instead requiring payment of octroi due from any person, mercantile firm or public body to be made at the time when the animals or goods in respect of which the octroi is leviable are introduced within its octroi limits, may at any time direct that an account-current shall be kept on behalf of the Council of the octroi so due from such person, firm or body. Such account shall be settled at intervals not exceeding one month, and such person, firm or public body shall give such information or details and make such deposit or furnish such security as the Council or any officer authorized by it in this behalf shall consider sufficient to cover the amount which may at any time be due from such person, firm or body in respect of such dues. Any amount so due at the expiry of any such interval shall, for the purposes of Chapter X, be deemed to be, and shall be recoverable in the same manner as, an amount claimed on account of any tax recoverable under the said chapter."

The petitioners were given the benefit of the facility under section 142 of the said Act. They were granted an account-current bearing Account No. 127 for the payment of octroi duty on the material imported within the limits of the respondent-Municipal Council. According to the petitioners, they have accordingly paid all octroi duty on all the goods so imported and have submitted a monthly statement of payments made in the prescribed form as required under the Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968. According to the petitioners, they have, right from the year 1973 onwards, regularly submitted, the monthly statements and have made payments of octroi dues as per the statements. According to the petitioners, at no time the correctness of the monthly statements submitted by the petitioners was questioned by the respondent- Council.

4. On 23rd July, 1982 the Octroi Inspector of the respondent visited the factory of the petitioners and sought to verify the octroi account of the petitioners right from May, 1973 up to March,1982. The petitioners thereafter received a letter dated 7th August, 1982 from the respondents setting out, inter alia, that on checking of accounts for the period 1973-74 upto March, 1982 it is found that a sum of Rs. 26,747.04 is payable by way of octroi. The petitioners were called upon to pay this amount within 7 days, failing which recovery proceedings would be taken under the provisions of sections 150, 151 and 152 of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965. On 30th August 1982 a bill for the said amount was served on the petitioners along with a covering letter of the same date. By thei
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top