SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Bom) 362

D.R.DHANUKA
Raman Lamba and others – Appellant
Versus
D. M. Harish and other – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.R. DHANUKA, J .:---Relying on section 31(4) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the petitioners have filed this petition for a direction that the impugned award be returned to the arbitrators for being filed in the High Court of Delhi on the ground that this award could not have been filed in this Court. The relevant facts and circumstances of the case leading to the filing of this petition are as under.

2. The petitioners alongwith respondents Nos. 3 to 7 were carrying on business as partners in the name and style of M/s. Hotel Diplomet at 9/39, Sardar Patel Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi. The deed of partnership contained an arbitration clause. Disputes and differences arose among the partners. Sometime in the month of January 1982, an agreement of reference was executed by and between the petitioners and respondents Nos. 3 to 7 to refer all their disputes and differences with regard to the said partnership business to the arbitration of respondents Nos. 1 and 2. The said partnership business was carried on at New Delhi. The said Hotel Diplomet is situate at new Delhi. The agreement of partnership was arrived at Bombay. Clauses 11, 15 and 16 of the said agreement of referenc

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top