SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Bom) 435

M.F.SALDANHA
Asaram Bhavandin Yadavd – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - M.F. SALDANHA, J.:--- The appellant in this case was the original accused No. 4 in Criminal Case No. 23 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule. The appellant along with the other accused was charged with having committed offences punishable under section 3 read with section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The accused were also charged with certain other offences which are not very material for the purposes of the decision of this appeal.

2. The learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the original accused Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of all the offences with which they stood charged but as far as original accused No. 4 i e. the present appellant is concerned, the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted him for having committed an offence punishable under section 3 read with section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The accused was sentenced to one day's simple imprisonment till the rising of the Court and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default, R.I. for three months. It is against this order of conviction and sentence that the present appeal has been preferred.

3. Mr. Navin Shah, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has raised a point of procedure th
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top