SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Bom) 466

V.A.MOHTA, N.W.SAMBRE
Umesh Vithalrao Balpande & another – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary And Higher Secondary Education, Nagpur – Respondent


JUDGMENT - MOHTA V.A., J.:---Rule returnable forthwith.

Heard by consent.

Umesh Balpande and his real brother Pravin the first and second petitioners appeared for the Secondary School Certificate Examination conducted in March 1991 by the Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, Nagpur Division (the Divisional Board) the respondent. Since their result was withheld, they filed a Writ Petition No. 2029 of 1991 in this Court, inter alia raising a contention that they did not know the reason for withholding the result. Notice before admission was issued to the respondent returnable on 19th August, 1991. In the meanwhile the petitioners received communication calling upon them to present themselves in the inquiry. Learned Counsel for the petitioners fairly informed about receipt of the said communication and their willingness to appear before the Inquiry Officer. On behalf of the respondent a statement was made that inquiry would be completed by 22nd August, 1991 and decision in the matter would be announced immediately, in any case not beyond 30th August, 1991. On those statements by the parties, the petition was disposed of on 19th August, 1991 with clarifi





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top