SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 156

B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Ravindra Umesh Gokarn and another – Appellant
Versus
Guest Keen Williams Ltd. and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.N. SRIKRISHNA, J. :—These two writ petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, impugn Part I Award dated 30-4-1985 and Part II Award dated 30-4-1986 made in Reference (IDA) Nos. 108 and 111 of 1978 (writ petition No. 6005 of 1986) and Part I Award dated 30-7-1984 and Part II Award dated 30-4-1986 made in Reference (IDA) Nos. 109 and 110 of 1978 (writ petition No. 2067 of 1987). Since the facts and circumstances giving rise to the present writ petition are common, and the contentions are identical, it would be convenient to dispose of both these writ petitions by a common judgment.

2. The petitioners in both the writ petitions were employed as workmen in the Industrial Establishment of the First Respondent in both writ petitions. Writ petition No. 6005 of 1986 pertains to two workmen, R.U. Gokarn and N.B. Dhamdhere, while Writ Petition No. 2067 of 1987

pertains to other two workmen, V.R. Thakurdesai and A.K. Maini.

3. The two Awards impugned by the Petitioners in the writ petition direct reinstalement of the petitioners with back wages at the rate of 60 per cent in the case of the three workmen other than Dhamdhere who has been granted back wages at the ra

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top