SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Bom) 542

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M.L. Dudhat, J.
Jayendra Shantaram Dighe and others... Appellants.
Versus
State of Maharashtra... Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 156 of 1984, decided on 20-11-1991.
Advocates appeared :
B.P. Apte, for the appellants.
Y.V. Patil, P.P., for the State.

Headnote:Section 149-Assembly initially lawful-Offences committed by some unidentified members of procession-Assembly turned to be unlawful Whether Criminal liability can be fastened on a member of such unlawful assembly.

       Held,- There must be evidence direct or circumstantial to show that accused persons actually anticipated or contemplated nature of illegal act to accomplish object of procession or knew that such an act would be committed or was likely to be committed to accomplish object of procession and that accused person shared common object of unlawful assembly.

       In order to see whether the accused persons who were present in the procession can be held guilty of the overt act done by some unidentified members of the procession by pelting stones at the police party, one has to see if there is any evidence, direct or circumstantial, to show that the accused persons actually anticipated or contemplated the nature of illegal act to accomplish the object of the procession or knew that such an act would be committed or was likely to be committed to accomplish the object of the procession and that the accused persons shared the common object of the unlawful assembly.

       On facts suddenly a few unidentified elements behaved in an unruly manner, which was not contemplated by other members of the procession and in view of the fact that huge crowd of about two thousand had assembled it was certainly difficult for other precisionists to extricate themselves from the procession and disperse. These fore merely because accused were in the procession, they can not be held guilty of the offences committed by the unidentified persons.

       

       Section 149-Scope-Unlawful Assembly-Procession peaceful throughout from beginning-Some unidentified members of procession committed some offences not contemplated by majority of members of procession.

       He/d,-Vicarious liability can not be foisted on other members of procession for holding them guilty of offences committed by unidentified members of unlawful assembly.

       In order to see whether the accused persons who were present in the procession can be held guilty of the overt act done by some unidentified members of the procession by pelting stones at the police party, one has to see If there is any evidence, direct or circumstantial, to show that the accused persons actually anticipated or contemplated the nature of illegal act to accomplish the object of the procession or knew that such an act would be committed or was likely to be committed to accomplish the object of the procession and that the accused persons shared the common object of the unlawful assembly.

JUDGMENT - M.L. DUDHAT, J.:---The only limited point that is to be decided in this appeal is, as to whether a member of an unlawful assembly which was initially lawful can be said to be guilty of the offences committed by the unidentified members of the unlawful assembly by foisting vicarious liability under section 149 of the Indian Penal Code?

2. In all thirty six persons from Baramati were charged under section 147, 148, 149, 295, 295-A, 332, 353, 434 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code. Out of these thirty six persons the present appellants, in all eighteen in number, were convicted under section 147, 148 and 332 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 250/- on each count and in default of payment of the fine to undergo simple imprisonment for ten days on each count. These appellants were acquitted of all the other charges for which they were charged before the trial Court. The rest of the accused persons were acquitted by the trial Court. It is against this decision dated December 12,1983, passed by Additional Sessional judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 75 of 1983, the present appellants have preferred this appeal.

3. A few facts which are material for deciding this appeal are as under:

On February 13, 1982, at about 12.30 noon one Dastagir resident of Baramati kept an excrement of a pig in front of the picture of Shivaji Maharaj. This injured the feelings of the local residents. To protest against the said insult and the injury caused to the sentiments, the workers of Vishwa Hindu Parishad decided to take out a morcha within the Baramati town. The morcha started from Sidheshwar Temple. It is the case of the prosecution that in the said morcha the accused persons carrying a Bhagwa flag were giving slogans viz., `Pakistan Murdabad', `Pakistan Jala do', `Landa Kapun Kadha' etc. At this stage, I may point out that the trial Court has disbelieved that such slogans were given, but the trial Court has come to the conclusion that slogans like `If you want to stay in India say Wande Mataram' were given. The said `morcha' commenced from Gandhi Chowk and thereafter went through Tandulwadi Chowk (Durga Talkies), back to Tandulwadi Chowk, Tahasil Office, Gandhi Chowk through Bagwan Galli, Subhash Chowk, Bhigwan Chowk, Indapur Chowk, and from there some processionists proceeded towards the S.T. Bus Station, Gunwadi Chowk. From there some processionists went towards Pan Galli, Kasba Chowk, Kattalkhana, Makka Masjid. Thereafter the morcha crossed the river and reached the temple of Panvatha Hanuman Mandir. From there, the morcha again intended to pass through Bagwan Galli where they had already passed earlier. However, the police prevented them from doing so apprehending some trouble, by the processionists who were about two thousand in number, to the Muslim community in the Bagwan lane. The police asked them to disperse. Thereupon some of the participants of the morcha pelted stones towards Dy. S.P., Jamadar and other Police Constables which caused injuries to certain Police Officers and the police staff. Therefore, the Dy. S.P. gave orders to P.C. Kamble to fire in air. As per the said order P.C. Kamble fired in air due to which the processionists dispersed. Subsequently, Sessions Case No. 75 of 1983 was filed against in all thirty six persons, including the present appellants, before the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. In the said case it was alleged that slogans like 'Pakistan Murdabad' `Pakistan Jala do', `Landyana Kapun Kadha' were given and that some of the processionists entered into makka Masjid and burnt mats papers and threw them in the river. It is also alleged that when the processionists came near Panvatha Hanuman Mandir and as the police obstructed the procession to proceed through the Bagwan Lane, the processionists pelted stones at the police party. On these allegations, all the thirty six persons were charged under section 147, 148, 149, 295, 295-A, 332, 353, 434 and 337 of


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top