SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 355

SUJATA V.MANOHAR, B.P.SARAF
Madhukar Sunderlal Sheth & others – Appellant
Versus
S. K. Laul & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Mrs. SUJATA MANOHAR, J.:---This writ petition challenges the letters addressed by the Income-tax Department to the petitioners at Exhibits 'C','E' and 'G' under which the department has said that on going through the agreement of sale it is found that the sale is subject to the approval of the Charity Commissioner and the Reserve Bank. Without such an approval the sale cannot take place and hence Form No. 37-I which is filed is treated as invalid. The agreement of sale in respect of the immovable property in question is between a public trust which is registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 and the purchasers, who are the petitioners. Under section 36 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 and the purchasers, who are the petitioners. Under section 36 of the Bombay Public Trust Act, no sale of any immovable property belonging to a public trust registered under the Act 'shall be valid without the previous sanction of the Charity Commissioner.'

2. Section 269UC of the Income-tax Act provides that no transfer of immovable property of value exceeding Rs. 5 lakhs shall be effective except after an agreement of transfer is entered into as prescribed therein, at least







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top