SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 194

V.A.MOHTA, M.F.SALDANHA
Palmira w/o Cruz Fernandes – Appellant
Versus
Cruz Fernandes – Respondent


JUDGMENT - V.A. MOHTA, J.:---Between the father and the mother to whom custody of minor child of tender age should be given is the usual but delicate question to be determined in this appeal.

2. Cruz Fernandes, the Respondent-husband, was married to palmira, the Appellant-wife on 2nd of February, 1986. They belong to Christian religion and were married as per Christian rites. Child Ian is the offspring of that marriage, born on 6th November, 1986. Marriage, unfortunately, was caught in rough weather. Even since 11th December, 1990, the husband and wife are living separately.

3. Palmira filed a petition under section 25 of the Guardians Wards Act, 1890 (the Act) for custody of Ian on 7th February, 1991 before the Family Court, Bombay. By order dated 9th July, 1991 the Family Court granted to her only the access to the child but not the custody. She has appealed.

4. Basic facts are :

Palmira is a Commerce Graduate serving in Punjab National Bank, receiving pay packet of Rs. 3,000/- per month after all deductions including towards repayment of loan for a flat at Virar, Bombay. Presently, she is living with her parents and unmarried brother in a small room in Bazar Road, Bandra, Bombay.


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top